Summary:
Unraveling the ownership structure of a listed company like AMV can be surprisingly tricky. This article digs into how to practically identify major AMV shareholders—especially those big institutions and high-profile individuals—using hands-on steps, real screenshots, regulatory sources, and a few war stories from my own attempts. We'll also compare how "verified trade" standards differ across countries, and throw in a real-world scenario so you see how shareholder transparency can get tangled up in international regulations.
Why Understanding AMV's Major Shareholders Matters
If you’re poking around AMV (Atlis Motor Vehicles Inc, ticker: AMV) stock, maybe for investment, market research, or just curiosity, you’ll notice something: shareholder data isn’t always served up on a silver platter. Trust me, I’ve gone down that rabbit hole—sometimes it’s like chasing shadows. But knowing who owns big chunks of AMV tells you a lot about the company’s stability, potential influence, and even risks (think: one big investor dumping shares).
Real-World Steps: How I Tracked Down AMV’s Major Shareholders
So, let’s get practical. Here’s how I actually go about finding out who the whales are when it comes to AMV stock. And yes, I made a couple of missteps, which I’ll share—so you avoid them.
Step 1: Start with SEC Filings (Form 13F & DEF 14A)
The U.S. SEC requires institutional investment managers with over $100 million in assets to file Form 13F every quarter. This lists their holdings, including AMV if they own it. Meanwhile, companies themselves file DEF 14A (proxy statements), which name directors, officers, and anyone with over 5%.
I went to the
SEC’s EDGAR search and plugged in “Atlis Motor Vehicles” and “AMV”. Screenshot below from my last search (note: don’t confuse with companies with similar names):

Funny story: The first time, I accidentally pulled up the filings for Ambow Education, which is also AMV on some exchanges—lesson learned, always check the CIK code (AMV's is 0001726119).
Inside the DEF 14A, there’s usually a table called “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management.” It will break down:
- Name of owner (institution/individual)
- Number of shares
- Percent of outstanding
You’ll usually see founders, key execs, and maybe a venture fund or two.
Step 2: Cross-Check with Nasdaq or NYSE Data
If you want a more digestible summary, Nasdaq and NYSE both provide institutional ownership summaries for listed companies. Here’s how I did it for AMV:
1. Go to
Nasdaq’s AMV institutional holdings page.
2. Look for “Top Institutional Holders” and “Top Mutual Fund Holders.”
3. You’ll see a breakdown like “Vanguard owns 5.2%,” “BlackRock 3.1%,” and so on (example below is illustrative; check live for latest).
Step 3: Use Market Data Aggregators (but with a Grain of Salt)
Sites like Yahoo Finance, MarketScreener, and Morningstar also compile this data. I’ve found inconsistencies—sometimes they lag behind official filings, or lump in small holders as “institutions.” Always double-check against the SEC.
Pro tip: On Yahoo Finance’s “Holders” tab for AMV, you’ll see “Top 10 Owners” and “Top Mutual Fund Holders.” But I once found a fund still listed months after they’d sold out—so again, treat this as a guide, not gospel.
Step 4: International Data—Where It Gets Messy
If AMV had cross-border listings or major international holders, you’d have to dig into disclosures from other regulatory bodies (e.g., UK’s FCA, EU’s ESMA). Each country has different “verified trade” and transparency standards.
Here’s a quick table I made while comparing:
Country/Region |
Standard Name |
Legal Basis |
Enforcement Agency |
USA |
13F, 13D/G Filings |
Securities Exchange Act (1934) |
SEC |
UK |
Disclosure Guidance & Transparency Rules |
FSMA 2000 |
FCA |
EU |
Major Holdings Notification |
Transparency Directive (2004/109/EC) |
ESMA/National regulators |
Japan |
Large Shareholding Report |
Financial Instruments and Exchange Act |
Japan FSA |
You can see that even the thresholds and timing of disclosure aren’t harmonized. For instance, in the US, anyone hitting 5% must file a 13D within 10 days (
SEC guidance), but in the UK, it’s a rolling 3% threshold with prompt disclosure.
Case Example: Shareholder Dispute in Cross-Border Context
Let’s imagine AMV’s largest institutional holder is a German pension fund. The US SEC would require a 13G filing at 5%, but German law might require earlier notification to BaFin (the German financial regulator). If the fund sells below 5% in the US but remains above the German reporting threshold, you get this fun scenario where the US market thinks they’re out, but German disclosures say otherwise.
I once ran into a similar problem researching NIO (NYSE: NIO), where a Chinese investor’s share sale was disclosed in China but took weeks to show up in US filings. It really messes with your understanding of who’s “in control” at any moment.
Expert Insight: Why Institutional Ownership is a Double-Edged Sword
I asked a friend who’s a portfolio manager at a mid-sized hedge fund about this. He said:
"People assume lots of institutional holders means a stock is ‘safe’—but big funds can be fickle. If a major index rebalances, you might get a flood of selling that has nothing to do with the company itself. Also, funds often coordinate, so a sudden shift can cause a domino effect."
So it’s not just about who owns the shares, but how likely they are to hold—or dump—when things change.
Bonus: Insiders vs. Institutions—Why Both Matter
In the AMV DEF 14A I checked, insiders (like founders and execs) often own a significant portion, especially in early-stage or recently public companies. This can align interests with shareholders—or, if one person holds too much, it can make outside investors nervous about “founder control.”
For example, Atlis Motor Vehicles’ founder Mark Hanchett reportedly owned a large chunk at IPO. (See
SEC DEF 14A filing)
Conclusion & What to Do Next
So, can you easily see who the major shareholders of AMV are? Yes, but you need to cross-check sources, watch for time lags, and understand international quirks. SEC filings (especially DEF 14A and 13F), Nasdaq summaries, and global equivalents are your best bet for up-to-date info.
If you’re considering an investment or just want to understand who’s really pulling the strings at AMV, go straight to the filings, not just aggregator sites. For a real wake-up call, compare the US and EU rules (see
WTO research on transparency). International differences can really cloud the picture.
One last tip: Set up alerts on the SEC site for new filings—saves you from missing a major change. And if you get confused by conflicting reports, you’re not alone. Even pros have to reconcile data across sources.
If you want to go deeper, check out the OECD’s
Principles of Corporate Governance for a global view on shareholder disclosure.
In summary: AMV’s major shareholders can be mapped, but only if you’re willing to do a little detective work—and always check the date on the data. Next up, I might do a deep dive into how AMV’s shareholder base has shifted since IPO, if people are interested (let me know in the comments or shoot me an email).