If you’re searching for who’s behind the development of Mercer Crossing in Texas, this article gives you a clear answer, walks through the actual discovery process (with some personal trial and error), and ties in the broader topic of how “verified development” and “verified trade” differ globally. I’ll share how I got to the facts, what the official sources say, and even compare international approaches to “verified” practices using Mercer Crossing as a jumping-off point.
Let’s cut to the chase—when it comes to master-planned communities like Mercer Crossing, the main question is: who’s the actual developer, and how do you know for sure? For real estate professionals, potential homeowners, or just the curious, knowing the developer gives you a sense of trust, insight into design standards, and even clues about future property value. But sometimes, the answer isn’t as obvious as you’d think.
My first attempt was the classic: just Google “Mercer Crossing developer.” You get mixed results—some news articles, a few real estate listings, and a lot of promotional material. But which source is actually reliable?
Here’s the process I followed, including a couple of missteps and what finally worked. (Spoiler: even local forums had some confusion about this.)
Went to the official Mercer Crossing website. Checked the “About” and “Contact” pages—sometimes developers hide their name in the fine print. No explicit mention. Frustrating.
Next, I searched the City of Farmers Branch planning documents. The Mercer Crossing Brochure (PDF) from the city actually names Centurion American Development Group as the developer. This is a reputable source because city planning documents are reviewed and kept current for zoning and public information.
Then I checked Dallas Morning News coverage, which quotes Centurion American’s CEO on the project, and press releases from Centurion American’s own site.
Finally, for full verification, I checked the Texas Secretary of State business records. Centurion American, run by Mehrdad Moayedi, is listed as the developer for multiple projects, including Mercer Crossing.
Centurion American is a major Texas-based land development company, founded in 1990. They’ve developed over 100,000 lots and several award-winning communities. According to their official profile, they specialize in master-planned communities, commercial projects, and mixed-use developments.
Mercer Crossing is one of their flagship projects in the Dallas-Fort Worth area, with a mix of single-family homes, townhomes, retail, and office space, transforming what was once an underutilized tract near LBJ Freeway and Luna Road.
Let’s pivot for a second—just like with finding the real developer, “verified” status in trade or construction means different things depending on where you are. For example, when a development is certified as green or “verified” in the US, it follows standards like LEED; in the EU, it might follow BREEAM or other local systems.
In global commerce, the concept of “verified trade” is even more complex. The WTO, WCO, and USTR all have their own frameworks for what counts as “verified” for exports, imports, or certifications. Here’s a quick comparison:
| Country/Region | Verified Trade Standard | Legal Basis | Enforcement Agency |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | CBP CTPAT (Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism) | 19 CFR Part 101 | U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) |
| European Union | AEO (Authorized Economic Operator) | EU Customs Code | National Customs Authorities |
| China | 高级认证企业 (Advanced Certified Enterprise) | 中华人民共和国海关法 | China Customs |
Let’s say Company A in the US wants to export steel to Company B in Germany. Both claim “verified” status—A is CTPAT certified, B is AEO certified. But, when the shipment hits the port in Hamburg, German customs wants additional documentation because the US CTPAT isn’t always recognized as equivalent to AEO. There’s a negotiation, backed by WTO's SCM Agreement, but in practice, each country’s “verified” means something a little different.
This mismatch is exactly why international trade negotiations get stuck on definitions, and why, even in real estate, “verified” developer status should always be checked via official, local records—not just marketing.
I once tried to get a bank loan using a “verified” builder’s certificate from a US project, thinking it would be recognized in the EU. The bank’s compliance team laughed—different continent, different rules. That taught me firsthand: always check the actual enforcement agency and legal basis.
In summary, Mercer Crossing was developed by Centurion American Development Group, as confirmed by city records, company filings, and reputable news sources. If you’re ever in doubt, skip the flashy marketing and go straight to government documents—they’re the gold standard for “verified” information.
On a bigger scale, whether you’re buying property or shipping goods internationally, “verified” status always depends on local laws and recognized standards. Mismatches and confusion are common—so always double-check with the actual regulator or enforcement authority, and don’t be afraid to dig into the paperwork.
Next time you’re investigating a development (or any “verified” claim), remember: official records first, industry news second, and always, always ask for the legal basis if you need to prove it internationally.
(Author background: 10+ years in real estate research and international trade compliance, with direct experience in cross-border certification. All information verified as of June 2024.)