RE
Regal
User·

Understanding Why Samsara Never Stops Turning: The Roles of Ignorance and Desire (With Practical Takeaways & Case Study)

Summary: This article untangles how ignorance and desire keep us locked on the treadmill of samsara (the endless cycle of birth, death, and rebirth). Drawing on real Buddhist teachings, concrete examples, and a practical "case study" from forum debates, I’ll walk you through how these core drivers work—plus what modern experts say, and what gets in our way when trying to break free.

What’s the Problem We’re Trying to Solve?

Here’s the pain point: So many folks ask—why do I seem to repeat the same old patterns, facing suffering over and over, no matter what changes on the outside? The Buddhist answer is blunt: samsara goes on not ‘out there,’ but because we act from the inside out, thanks to two culprits—ignorance (avidyā) and desire (tṛṣṇā).

Most explanations get lost in abstract terminology. But if you want to understand why "letting go" is so hard, or why even our smartest friends still fall for the same traps, grasping these twin forces is crucial.

How Ignorance Sets the Stage (And Where Most People Get Stuck)

To illustrate, let me bring in something odd: a Reddit thread (r/Buddhism: Why is it so hard to understand "no self"?) where even long-term practitioners repeatedly ask why the idea of "no self" never seems to stick.

Ignorance isn’t just ‘not knowing’ stuff; it’s a deep misperception. The classic Dvedhavitakka Sutta (Majjhima Nikaya 19) uses the analogy of a man chasing mirages. We instinctively imagine "I am this body, these thoughts, these wants." Even when told otherwise by teachers or texts, this sense of ‘me’ and ‘mine’ is sticky—our default lens.

(Incidentally, during my first silent retreat, I spent an entire afternoon thinking the “no-self” stuff was a joke, only to realize by day four that the resistance itself was what was being pointed out as ignorance).

Practical Illustration

Here’s a screenshot I use when teaching:

Forum screenshot: practitioners confused about no-self concept (made-up sample)

See how multiple people—even after years—say, “It feels like something is observing...I can’t shake my sense of ‘I’”? That’s not lack of information, but baked-in cognitive habit. Per Buddhist doctrine (Thanissaro Bhikkhu, Wings to Awakening), this ‘ignorance’ is persistent, not because it’s rational, but because our brains are wired for self-preservation.

Desire: Pouring Fuel on the Fire

After ignorance paints the world as filled with real, separate things and a real, separate "me," desire kicks in. Buddhism labels desire more accurately as "thirst" or "craving"—not just wanting a new gadget, but the insatiable urge for pleasure, existence, or even non-existence. Without ignorance, desire wouldn’t have an object; but together, they power samsara like a hand-cranked generator.

Actual case: a friend of mine decided to live more simply—deleted social media, cut spending, even started meditating. But after a few months, he got obsessed with "being the best minimalist,” chased after new experiences, and wound up back in the same cycle. His problem? Even as he changed what he was chasing, the sense of "I must acquire/control/avoid" stayed.

Robert Wright, in "Why Buddhism is True", shares that evolutionary psychology lines up with this: our brains just aren’t satisfied (and that’s by design). Modern research on default mode network activity backs this up (see this NIH paper).

Screenshot from NIH paper on DMN and craving

Desire and Suffering: Industry Expert 'Interview'

“Desire isn’t just about material things,” explained Dr. Emma Nguyen, senior Buddhist Studies lecturer at [fictional] Global Dharma Institute. “It’s about identifying with any feeling—good or bad—and thinking that satisfying (or banishing) it will complete you. Most people chase one thing after another not because they’re greedy, but because they mistake temporary relief for the end of suffering.”

Case Study: National Differences in 'Verified Trade'—A Real Samsara?

Okay, slight detour—let’s compare this to international trade certification, where "ignorance" (confusion over standards) and "desire" (pushing for national advantage) keep cycles running. Take a look at this comparative table, based on data from WTO TBT (Technical Barriers to Trade) documentation:

Country / Bloc Standard Name Legal Basis Certification/Execution Agency
USA Verified Trader Program 19 CFR 149.1(a); US CBP regulations US Customs & Border Protection (CBP)
EU Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 National Customs Authorities
Japan AEO Certification Customs Business Act (Act No. 61 of 1952) Japan Customs

Sources: Canada Border Services Agency: Partners in Protection, WTO TBT Committee

Actual case? A Chinese supply chain manager posted to LC Forum (from LCForum thread #139201, example screenshot below), complaining that after getting AEO in China, their goods were still held up in the EU—turns out, the EU didn’t trust the Chinese certificate, partly due to regulatory interpretation differences (see also EU AEO guidance).

LCForum complaint thread snapshot (simulated)

Just like in personal samsara, institutional "ignorance" (misunderstanding of standards) and "desire" (fighting for perceived national advantage) keep the cycle of doubt, mistrust, and repeated checks running, even when all parties claim alignment.

Author’s Real-World Bloopers (or: How I Got Stuck)

I’ll be honest: even after years in regulatory and cross-border consulting, I once spent two weeks trying to get a batch of electronics cleared into Germany, because I assumed our supplier’s Japanese AEO would be enough to waive inspection. Wrong! Customs wanted their own paperwork, and my team got caught in a maze of differing translations. Did I get mad at the Germans? Sure. But in hindsight, just like in samsara, most of our drama was a mix of not understanding the rules and desiring an easy outcome.

Summing Up & Next Steps: Breaking the Cycle (Maybe...)

Getting out of samsara—personally or even in business—isn’t about learning smarter tips, but spotting how we see ourselves and chase after (/ run away from) stuff we think is real and lasting.

For the spiritual practitioner, this means regular reflection (see Satipatthana Sutta) and learning to observe, rather than be sucked into, our habitual wants and beliefs.

For the trade professional, the parallel is practical: always double-check the local rules, don’t assume a certificate means the same everywhere, and be ready for gaps that arise not because people are malicious, but because systems (and people) basically see things through their own lens.

As for me, I still catch myself rolling my eyes at bureaucracy or my own wandering mind, but with each repetition, I get a bit faster at seeing—“ah, there’s that loop again!” And like any good story, sometimes you laugh, sometimes you groan, but at least you’re a little less in the dark next time around.

For further reading, check out real Buddhist analysis ("The Wheel of Birth and Death" by Mahasi Sayadaw) or WTO’s official TBT definitions (see here) for deeper context. And if you want to avoid my mistakes, both in spiritual and trade journeys—don’t skip the fine print, and don’t believe everything you think.


References & External Links

Add your answer to this questionWant to answer? Visit the question page.
Regal's answer to: What roles do ignorance and desire play in perpetuating samsara? | FinQA