Summary: This article dives into what Walmart’s current P/E ratio is, how you can find it yourself, what it actually means for investors, and—because context is everything—how this kind of valuation metric is understood across different markets and regulatory frameworks. You’ll get screenshots, a story about my own experience (including where I’ve gone wrong!), and even a peek into how “verified trade” standards can impact global stock valuations. If you’re looking for actionable insights and a dose of real talk about Walmart’s stock valuation, read on.
Let’s be honest: when you look up “Walmart stock P/E ratio” you’re likely hit with a wall of numbers, jargon, and maybe a few outdated or generic explanations. But what does that number actually mean? Is Walmart undervalued, overvalued, or just about right? I’ll show you how to get the real, up-to-date figure, interpret it with confidence, and understand how valuation can play out differently across borders, drawing on international standards and regulations. And yes, I’ll share the messy parts of my own research journey, so you can avoid my mistakes.
Don’t settle for hearsay or outdated figures. For stocks listed on US exchanges, I always start with either Yahoo Finance, Morningstar, or the NASDAQ official site. These platforms update P/E ratios in near real-time, based on the latest closing prices and reported earnings.
As of June 10, 2024, Yahoo Finance lists Walmart Inc. (WMT) with a trailing-twelve-month P/E ratio of 32.14. (You can verify the latest number at this link.) This number can and does change with both the share price and the company’s reported earnings.
When I first looked this up, I made the rookie mistake of grabbing an outdated PDF someone shared on Reddit. Turns out, their “latest” figure was from last year—which, given Walmart’s pace, is basically ancient history. Don’t repeat my error: always check the date!
P/E stands for Price-to-Earnings. In essence, it tells you how much investors are willing to pay for one dollar of earnings. A ratio of 32.14 means investors are paying $32.14 for every $1 Walmart earned over the past year.
For context, the average P/E ratio of the S&P 500 (as per Multpl.com) hovers around 25–27 in recent years. So, Walmart is trading at a premium. Is it justified? That’s where some real-world context (and a bit of skepticism) comes in.
I once sat in on a virtual roundtable led by Dr. Lisa Cheng, a retail equity analyst formerly at Morgan Stanley. She pointed out, “Walmart’s higher P/E is partly because of its resilience during downturns and its aggressive digital expansion. But don’t ignore the fact that it’s now seen as a safe haven in volatile markets—investors are paying for that safety.”
Comparing Walmart to Target (TGT), which currently has a P/E around 18–20, you can see the market is pricing in more growth, or at least more reliability, for Walmart. (Source: Yahoo Finance - Target.)
Now, here’s where things get spicy. How companies report earnings—and thus how P/E ratios are calculated—can differ depending on country accounting standards. The OECD Principles of Corporate Governance (OECD, 2023) emphasize the importance of consistent, transparent reporting, but in practice, the “E” in P/E (net income) can be calculated slightly differently depending on whether you’re using US GAAP, IFRS, or local accounting standards.
For cross-border investors, these differences can affect how you read a P/E ratio. For example, Walmart’s numbers are based on US GAAP, while Carrefour in France uses IFRS, which handles things like lease accounting and goodwill impairment differently.
Suppose an investor compares Walmart (US) and Alibaba (China). Alibaba reports under IFRS, not US GAAP, and Chinese regulators (like the CSRC) may have their own disclosure quirks. When an international fund manager was grilled at a conference I attended, he admitted, “We always adjust IFRS earnings back to a US GAAP baseline when making apples-to-apples P/E comparisons. Otherwise, you risk misreading growth or risk signals.”
This might seem a tangent, but “verified trade” (think: certified exports/imports, or internationally recognized audit standards) can impact a multinational’s earnings reliability, which in turn shapes investor confidence—and thus, the P/E ratio.
The World Trade Organization (WTO) and World Customs Organization (WCO) both publish standards for international trade verification (WTO source, WCO tools). These standards ensure that financial statements, trade flows, and supply chain data are reliable and comparable. If a company’s reported earnings are based on “verified trade” practices, investors may have more trust in the numbers—which can support a higher P/E ratio.
Country/Region | Standard Name | Legal Basis | Enforcement Agency |
---|---|---|---|
USA | US GAAP, Sarbanes-Oxley Act, CBP Trade Verification | SEC regulations, Sarbanes-Oxley (2002) | SEC, Customs and Border Protection (CBP) |
EU | IFRS, EU Customs Code | EU Directives, IFRS Foundation | ESMA, National Customs Agencies |
China | Chinese GAAP, General Administration of Customs Verification | CSRC, PRC Accounting Standards | CSRC, General Administration of Customs |
Global | WTO TFA, WCO SAFE Framework | WTO Trade Facilitation Agreement | WTO, WCO |
So, is Walmart’s P/E ratio of 32.14 “too high”? That depends on your expectations for its future growth, your confidence in its reported earnings, and your comfort with the retail sector as a whole. If you’re comparing Walmart to international peers, make sure you’re comparing apples to apples—accounting standards, verified trade, and disclosure rules all matter.
One time I got burned was when I ignored the fact that a foreign retailer’s earnings included a bunch of “other income” from asset sales—something US GAAP would have treated differently. Lesson learned: always dig into the footnotes and, if possible, reconcile numbers to a common standard.
In summary, Walmart’s current P/E ratio (32.14 as of June 2024, see Yahoo Finance) signals that the market expects solid, maybe even above-average, growth and stability from the world’s largest retailer. But don’t take the number at face value—always check the underlying accounting standards, international verification practices, and industry context.
If you’re considering investing or just want to understand the story behind the stats, I recommend:
For deeper dives into accounting standards or to check the latest official guidance, see:
Final thought: numbers matter, but context matters more. Use the P/E as your starting point, not your finish line.