Summary: Thinking of joining a proprietary trading firm, but not sure what the catch is? This guide breaks down the typical fees (upfront and recurring), shares hands-on experience, and compares real-world costs at leading prop firms. I’ll bring in insider interviews, screenshot walk-throughs, and even mess up a demo challenge or two. Plus, you’ll get a table comparing “verified trade” compliance in different countries and how actual laws shape your experience (with sources). The goal? You’ll know exactly where your money goes before risking a cent.
Most aspiring traders diving into prop firms are hit with flashy ads—“Manage $100,000! Keep 90% of profits!”—yet the real nitty-gritty about fees and costs often hides in the fine print. Let’s face it: you care about what you’ll actually pay. And I’ve been there. Sign-up, challenge, monthly membership, data fees, sometimes even withdrawal charges—these really add up.
So this article answers: What fees will I face at leading prop firms, and do those costs make sense long term? I’ll mix first-hand experience, expert takes, screenshots, and plenty of “oh no” moments from my own prop trading journey!
This is the most common upfront cost. Prop firms like FTMO, MyForexFunds (pre-2023 troubles), and The 5%ers all charge a challenge or evaluation fee—typically between $50 and $1,300, depending on the capital you want to “manage”.
Example: A $100k FTMO challenge currently costs €540 (about $580): source
Some newer firms offer "subscription" models—an ongoing fee for access to their "instant funding" or simulated accounts. For example, True Forex Funds (trueforexfunds.com) charges monthly on certain programs. These fees range from $100 to $400/month, but often come after a successful challenge or with certain “express” models.
Insider tip from a Discord mod at Apex Trader Funding: “Our $147/month is mainly for real-time data and admin, but we waive it if you hit your first payout.” (From their public Discord, March 2024.)
Futures and equities prop firms often pass on market data and software fees (e.g. CME Level 2, TradingView Pro). For example, Topstep charges $130/month for funded futures accounts: Topstep Fee Schedule
Not a direct “fee”, but vital—prop firms take a percentage of your profits (e.g., you keep 80%, they keep 20%). On top, some charge processing fees for withdrawals, especially on international wires or certain payment methods.
Hot tip: I once lost $35 on a wire payout from The Funded Trader due to a bank intermediary fee I hadn’t anticipated. Always check both the firm’s policy and your payment provider!
While not “fees”, firms offering synthetic trading environments may widen spreads, limit platform features, or “delay fills” to simulate market conditions. This shows up as slippage/cost rather than a transparent fee. Broker reviews and prop firm Reddit threads often call this out (Is FTMO rigged for slippage?).
Here’s what actually happened when I signed up for an FTMO challenge—in true, slightly messy fashion. Screenshots below for reference.
Point is, the only “mandatory” fee here was the challenge fee (€345). No other hidden costs appeared until I’d passed the evaluation (which, for full transparency, I didn’t the first time—over-risked on Gold, classic mistake).
Sometimes, the devil’s in the details. Here’s a quick breakdown of 2024 “real world” prop firm cost structures:
For more up-to-date crowdsourced fee comparisons, the 2024 prop firm mega-thread on Reddit r/propfirms is a goldmine of trader’s horror (and success) stories.
Joe, a fellow trader I met via X, documented his route with Topstep. He paid $165 for the eval, another $130 each month for his data/platform, and eventually got a $7,500 payout. But—his Payoneer withdrawal cost $75, and there was a $120 “inactivity” fee for a dormant sub-account. Ouch.
Joe’s lesson: “Always read the fine print, and ask in public Discords—most fees aren’t obvious on sales pages.” (Reference: TraderJoe on X, March 2024)
Here’s where things get weird: which markets are considered “legit” for prop trading? Not all prop firms are fully regulated, especially ones offering sim/demo accounts. According to the UK FCA (FCA Advisory), most retail funding props aren’t FCA-authorized, and some models don’t require a license.
Meanwhile, the US CFTC (CFTC Prop Trading Advisory) only requires registration if a firm offers retail brokerage services not if they purely offer simulated “evaluation” environments.
The WTO and OECD both reference “verified trade” as a key term for international transactions and compliance. But (and here’s a wild true story), in 2020, the French AMF shut down a “prop firm” for not verifying that simulated trades reflected real market liquidity, affecting hundreds of retail clients (AMF warning).
Country/Region | Standard/Definition | Legal Reference | Oversight Body | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|
USA | "Registered entity" for true brokerage; sim trading not regulated | CEA, CFTC rulebook | CFTC, NFA | Sim/demo prop firms largely unregulated |
UK | “FSMA authorization” for taking retail deposits; demo-only props exempt | FSMA/IFA 2000 | FCA | Warning list for fake props |
France | Demo props must prove trade linkage to actual markets | AMF #2020-231 | AMF | Several props blacklisted 2020-2024 |
Australia | Requires AFSL for client funds; not for sim-only props | AFSL Act | ASIC | Sim props not formally regulated |
EU (general) | MiFID II applies to “investment services” only | MiFID II | ESMA/National | Demo props a grey area |
"Most retail prop firms don't require full regulatory supervision, as long as they're not holding client money or offering brokerage services. But always check the oversight status—especially if a firm claims you can trade 'real funds' instantly. Regulation gives you recourse if things go south." – Dr. Simon Parker, Prop Trading Researcher, excerpt from LinkedIn Pulse, 2024
So, back to the big question: are the costs worth it? Here’s what I found after three challenge attempts (FTMO, Topstep, MyForexFunds before they went kaboom). Upfront fees are inevitable—usually $100–$1,000+, depending on account size. Recurring fees hit more on futures/equities firms. “Hidden” costs are less obvious—data, payout and inactivity charges sneak up fast.
What tripped me up: skipping the fine print (especially payout policies and “what happens if you fail a challenge”), and emotional overtrading to “get my fee’s worth.” Don’t do it.
Next steps? Before joining, calculate your “all-in” cost for the first year against the probability of passing a challenge. If possible, demo their platform risk-free before shelling out cash.
Last word—if you spot a prop promising the moon (“No fee! Instant payout! 99% win rate!”), run for the hills. Stick to firms with a solid community, multiple years in business, and transparent, written fee policies. You’ll thank me later (or curse me slightly less).
Author: Tom Lee, independent trader since 2017. Three failed prop challenges, two payouts, and plenty of lessons learned the hard way. Professional profile: LinkedIn
Key official references: FTMO FAQ, Topstep Fees, FCA UK Advisory, CFTC US Advisory, French AMF Alert