Here’s the deal: tons of traders want to automate their strategies. Maybe you have a simple moving average crossover bot, or you’re running a fancy AI model. But with the explosive growth of remote prop firms like FTMO, MyForexFunds, Topstep, and others, the rules are all over the place. Some say “no bots allowed,” others seem fine with it, and then there are hidden rules about “copy trading” or “third-party software.”
I’ve personally tested several of these prop firms—sometimes with embarrassing results. So instead of just quoting their FAQs, let me show you what it looks like when you try to run an EA (Expert Advisor) on MetaTrader, or plug your Python script into a prop account. But first, let’s get a sense of the landscape.
Let’s start with the big names. Here’s what their official rules look like (as of June 2024):
Bottom line: Most major prop firms technically allow algorithmic or automated trading, but only if it’s your own system. If you’re buying a commercial off-the-shelf EA or copying signals, you’re likely violating their terms.
Here’s where things get interesting. Let me walk you through what happened when I tried wiring up a basic trend-following bot to a demo FTMO account on MetaTrader 5.
The lesson? Even when prop firms say algo trading is allowed, they’re actively monitoring for patterns that look like copy trading or unfair advantages. If you’re writing your own code, be ready to defend it.
Real talk: I’ve seen traders lose their funded accounts (and profits) for using commercial bots or copying signals. Prop firms are getting smarter—they use software to fingerprint popular EAs.
Here’s a Forex Factory post where a user shares their FTMO account ban after using a purchased EA. The support team sent them a detailed log showing suspicious trade clustering.
The upshot: You can absolutely use bots at most leading prop firms—but you must be able to prove it’s your own work. Anything else is a gamble.
Now, let’s zoom out. The idea of a “verified trade” isn’t just a prop firm thing. Globally, standards for what counts as a legitimate, auditable trade vary—especially when you’re dealing with complex, automated transactions.
Country/Region | Standard Name | Legal Basis | Enforcement Agency |
---|---|---|---|
USA | Regulation AT (Algorithmic Trading) | CFTC 17 CFR Part 1 | Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) |
EU | MiFID II / RTS 6 | Directive 2014/65/EU | European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) |
Singapore | MAS Guidelines on Algo Trading | SFA (Cap. 289), MAS Notice SFA 04-N16 | Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) |
Australia | ASIC Market Integrity Rules | ASIC MIR 2010 | Australian Securities & Investments Commission (ASIC) |
Each regulatory authority has its own definition of “verified trade.” For example, the CFTC’s Regulation AT requires all algo systems to have kill switches and full audit trails. The EU’s MiFID II RTS 6 is even stricter about risk controls for automated systems. If you want more on this, check out the OECD’s 2023 report on Algorithmic Trading.
Why does this matter for prop firms? Because a lot of them are now integrating these regulatory standards into their monitoring. If your bot fails to leave a proper audit trail, or looks like it’s “gaming” the system, you could get flagged—even if you’re not breaking the letter of the rules.
Here’s a story from a friend I met at a trading hackathon. He tried to use the same mean-reversion bot at two different prop firms—one US-based, one EU-regulated. The US firm flagged his account after a week, saying his trades looked suspiciously like “order book spoofing” (which is banned under CFTC rules). The EU firm, following MiFID II, just asked for a copy of his source code and let him keep trading.
The point? Even among legit firms, there’s no single “global” standard for what counts as legit algo trading. You’ll need to check each firm’s and country’s rules.
As Dr. Eva Zhang, a quant developer and consultant for several EU-based prop firms, told me in a Zoom call:
“Prop firms are under pressure from regulators. They don’t care if your bot is smart or dumb—they care about transparency and auditability. If you can show your work, most firms will let you run it. If not, you’re out.”
After all my testing, forum lurking, and direct run-ins with prop firm compliance teams, here’s my blunt advice:
I once lost a whole month’s profits because my bot “looked too similar” to a popular EA. Lesson learned: prop firms are not playgrounds for quick hacks.
Can you use algorithmic or automated trading at top prop firms? The answer is “usually yes, but only if it’s your own work, and you can prove it.” If you’re serious about running bots, read every rule, ask support for confirmation, and keep your work transparent.
Next steps? If you want to get started, try FTMO’s free demo, or check out Topstep for futures. And don’t forget to join forums like Forex Factory to see what’s working (and what gets banned).
Final word: Don’t let rules scare you off—just don’t try to cheat. Prop firms are looking for real, responsible traders. If you’re up for the challenge, automation can actually be your edge.