Summary: If you’re itching to break into prop trading but dread the daily commute, you’re probably wondering: can you actually work remotely with the best prop firms? This article tears apart the bold claims and confusing realities about remote proprietary trading, gives you real-world company comparisons, and even unpacks the international rules that can trip you up if you think moving abroad is a shortcut. Expect stories, data, and a bit of friendly cynicism, all rooted in real experience and the latest regulations.
Short answer: Yes, most leading prop trading firms now have robust remote options—but it comes with trade-offs and not every “remote” job is really what you expect.
Back in 2018, if you wanted to trade firm capital, you’d likely be on the hook for showing up in person, at least occasionally—especially in the US and UK. Now, though, outfits like Topstep, FTMO, MyFundedFX, and The 5%ers have all-in remote models so frictionless you can apply, verify, and trade from your couch—coffee in hand, pajamas optional. I know, because I’ve gone through most of these platforms during my quest for ‘the right fit’ (read: least hassle, most upside, lowest chance of account ban mid-trade). Some firms, like Jane Street and SIG, are still very much in-office, citing “team culture” and trade secrecy. But for retail-facing funding — think “pass the challenge, get funded” firms — remote is the default.
Let’s show you the actual process: I signed up for FTMO’s challenge in 2023 while living in Malaysia (I’m a Canadian citizen). The steps:
No headquarters, no physical paperwork—a totally remote experience. No one cared about my time zone, except me, realizing London Open is at 3PM local and messing up my sleep schedule massively.
Here’s a practical, “been there, tried that, been burned” list. Some entries are from FTMO’s official competitor reviews and TrustPilot forums (not scientific, but hilariously honest):
This bit gets surprisingly gnarly. Many prop firms are “unregulated” in the sense they aren’t formal financial intermediaries—yet local laws can bite you if you’re trading from, say, the UAE, India, or Canada, where certain leveraged retail trading is restricted or banned.
To give you a sense, here’s a table comparing differences among three major nations for international prop trading (“verified trade”) participation:
Country | Standard Name | Legal Basis | Enforcing Body | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
United States | Proprietary Trading Exemption, Reg D | Securities Exchange Act of 1934; CFTC regulations | SEC, CFTC, NFA | Firms must avoid retail U.S. clients unless fully registered. [SEC Guidance] |
European Union | MiFID II Exempt (Own Account) | Directive 2014/65/EU | ESMA, Local National Authorities | Prop trading generally allowed unless classified as “investment services.” [ESMA MiFID II Q&A] |
Australia | Proprietary Trading License Exempt | Corporations Act 2001 (es. Part 7.6) | ASIC | Certain remote/online funding models flagged by ASIC. [ASIC Prop Trading] |
To sum up: most international prop firms duck under official “broker” scrutiny, but your country might see things differently. In India, for example, authorities have actually fined traders for violating local forex rules using international-funded accounts (RBI Circular, July 2022).
Let’s take “Lee”—who traded remotely for MyFundedFX from Singapore, and “Anna,” who tried the same in Canada. Lee’s account flew—great profits, paid out to a Singapore bank, no problem. Anna? She cleared the prop firm’s challenge, but her payout got stuck at an intermediary because the receiving bank flagged “international financial services” as a trigger for extra compliance. Anna eventually got her money—after providing a statement from MyFundedFX confirming she wasn’t trading on behalf of clients, circumventing Canadian “derivatives dealer” rules. This sounded convoluted, but she posted a detailed step-by-step on r/propfirms that matches my own prior headaches with Canadian banks (see: “Prop firm payout stuck in limbo,” Reddit Thread).
“A key challenge with remote prop trading is payouts, especially in countries with strong anti-money laundering controls. I’ve advised many traders to keep crystal-clear documentation—screenshots, KYC confirmation, trading logs. Ironically, you’re more likely to need a lawyer’s help with local compliance than with the prop firm itself.”—Excerpted from a May 2023 interview with compliance consultant Raymond Zhou, CFA.
During a recent online conference (PropTech Connect 2023), I heard Jane Li, former legal counsel at a top European prop firm, say:
“The genie’s out of the bottle after COVID. Remote trading isn’t a fad—it’s the new normal. But regulators play catch-up. If you’re going remote, especially cross-border, spend as much time on legal research as you do on your trading strategy—or you may regret it.”
The remote revolution has flipped the world of prop trading. Top firms like FTMO, MyFundedFX, and The 5%ers offer fully remote trading with seamless onboarding and no in-person requirements. The upsides are real: flexibility, global reach, zero commute. Yet don’t ignore the risks—tech failures, loneliness, and, most of all, local regulatory traps can all bite hard when you least expect it.
Here’s my advice, based on first-hand facepalms and cautious optimism:
Remote proprietary trading absolutely works with top global firms, but only if you go in with eyes open. If you’re willing to handle the paperwork and the occasional regulatory hoop-jumping, you really can trade the world—from anywhere on earth that gives you half-decent wifi.